[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto()
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@...>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 12:35:44 +0200
* Benoit Germain:
> Isn't this implementation detail already indirectly exposed by the
> existence of pairs/ipairs?
No, you could implement them even without an array part. (Javascript
does something in that direction, after all.) ipairs() might even
have something to iterate if the array part is empty.
