lua-l archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index]

• May 01, 2010
  • Re: Lua and the iPhone, Ed
  • Re: Lua and the iPhone, Joseph Saadé
  • Re[2]: Lua and the iPhone, Arseny Vakhrushev
  • Re: Lua and the iPhone, KHMan
  • Re: 2-d Array, Christoph Schreiber
  • Non SQL databases, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Lucas Hermann Negri
  • Compiling a DLL to be used in Lua, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: number parsing question, spir ☣
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Michal Kottman
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Luciano de Souza
  • lucksocket ipv6 patch?, startx
  • Re: Compiling a DLL to be used in Lua, Tom N Harris
  • Re: FPE with using >INT_MAX numbers in Lua, Shmuel Zeigerman
• May 02, 2010
  • lqt on OS X, Doug Currie
  • 5.2.0 (work 2), Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2), Rob Kendrick
  • Re: QtLua Library on windows, Alexandre Becoulet
  • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2), Gavin Wraith
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Scott Vokes
  • Trying to make a World of Warcraft addon. Very unfamiliar with Lua., Deejai
  • Re: Trying to make a World of Warcraft addon. Very unfamiliar with Lua., Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• May 03, 2010
  • CSE chains in LuaJIT 2.0, Nicholas Nethercote
  • Re: CSE chains in LuaJIT 2.0, Mike Pall
  • Help Porting Lua embedded app to Windows 7, Edward Mitchell
  • converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: a little someting missing in the C API?, Benoit Germain
  • Re: converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: alittle someting missing in the C API?, Alex Davies
  • Re: converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: a little someting missing in the C API?, Julien Cugnière
  • Re: converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: a little someting missing in the C API?, Patrick Donnelly
• May 04, 2010
  • Re: Lua and the iPhone, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), François Perrad
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), HyperHacker
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), steve donovan
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Duncan Cross
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), steve donovan
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Florian Weimer
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), François Perrad
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), steve donovan
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Duncan Cross
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), spir ☣
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), steve donovan
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), François Perrad
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), François Perrad
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), spir ☣
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Duncan Cross
  • Re: Lua Perl Bridge, Rob Hoelz
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), GrayFace
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
  • Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Alex Queiroz
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Alex Queiroz
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Doug Currie
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Shortest Path, Mariusz Stanisz
  • Re: Lua Perl Bridge, Rob Hoelz
  • Re: Shortest Path, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: Shortest Path, Mariusz Stanisz
  • Re: Shortest Path, varol kaptan
  • Re: Shortest Path, Mariusz Stanisz
  • Re: Shortest Path, Geoff Leyland
• May 05, 2010
  • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
  • Running Lua as CGI handler?, Gilles Ganault
  • [Windows] How to access SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • CGILua binary for Windows?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Yuri Takhteyev
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Ignacio Burgueño
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Henk Boom
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Doug Currie
• May 06, 2010
  • Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Charles Nicholson
  • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: CSE chains in LuaJIT 2.0, Nicholas Nethercote
  • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Vaughan McAlley
  • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Patrick Donnelly
  • [] in C struct, Silence
  • Re: [] in C struct, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: [] in C struct, Aurora
  • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: [] in C struct, steve donovan
  • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [] in C struct, frank
  • Re: [] in C struct, steve donovan
  • Re: Re: [] in C struct, Aurora
  • Re: [] in C struct, KHMan
  • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Charles Nicholson
  • A very strange problem in C code., Aurora
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Aurora
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Aurora
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Bulat Ziganshin
  • luadoc installation: enough reading, need revelation, Mark Szpakowski
  • Re: luadoc installation: enough reading, need revelation, Duboucher Thomas
  • Re: luadoc installation: enough reading, need revelation, Hisham
  • Re: luadoc installation: enough reading, need revelation, Hisham
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Sean Conner
• May 07, 2010
  • Is this a bug?, xiayong
  • "namespaces and "constructor calls", Christoph Schreiber
  • Re: "namespaces and "constructor calls", Florian Weimer
  • Re: [Windows] How to access SQLite?, sagasw
  • debugging a C module using LfW?, Benoit Germain
  • Re: debugging a C module using LfW?, steve donovan
  • 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Florian Weimer
  • RE: debugging a C module using LfW?, Antonio Scuri
  • Implementing "super()" for classes, Aaron MacDonald
  • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, Ted Unangst
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, Romulo
  • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, Arseny Vakhrushev
• May 08, 2010
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, spir ☣
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, steve donovan
  • Re: [Windows] How to access SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, spir ☣
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, HyperHacker
• May 09, 2010
  • sunday afternoon whishlist, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Peter Cawley
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Florian Weimer
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, liam mail
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Eike Decker
  • Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2), Florian Weimer
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Tony Finch
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, anna
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon wishlist, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: sunday afternoon wishlist, Peter Cawley
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Duncan Cross
  • Inheritance, Christoph Schreiber
  • Re: Inheritance, Florian Weimer
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Richard Hundt
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: Inheritance, Christoph Schreiber
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Richard Hundt
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
  • Re: Inheritance, Florian Weimer
  • Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2), Drake Wilson
  • Re: sunday afternoon wishlist, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
  • Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Andre Leiradella
• May 10, 2010
  • Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
  • Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
  • [Lua 5.2] luaL_ref and the LUA_RIDX_* fields, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Is this a bug?, Mark Feldman
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Juris Kalnins
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, steve donovan
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Eike Decker
  • RE: debugging a C module using LfW?, Benoit Germain
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, steve donovan
  • RE: debugging a C module using LfW?, Benoit Germain
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: [Lua 5.2] luaL_ref and the LUA_RIDX_* fields, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Is this a bug?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • IUP 'TreeSetUserId' problem in Ubuntu, bhou
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Marc OMorain
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Tony Finch
  • [ANN] GitHub repository for LuaPerl, Rob Hoelz
  • RE: IUP 'TreeSetUserId' problem in Ubuntu, Antonio Scuri
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Quae Quack
  • [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
  • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, Arseny Vakhrushev
  • Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2), Florian Weimer
  • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Jonathan Castello
  • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, Arseny Vakhrushev
• May 11, 2010
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Juris Kalnins
  • Syslogintr just released. A syslog daemon that uses Lua, Sean Conner
  • Bug in LNUM patch, Flemming Madsen
  • TomTom GPS navigator and Lua, Leo Razoumov
  • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Leo Razoumov
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Juris Kalnins
  • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Hans Hagen
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, Arseny Vakhrushev
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Gary Bringhurst
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, "J.Jørgen von Bargen"
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Petite Abeille
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Alex Davies
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, "J.Jørgen von Bargen"
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Leo Razoumov
  • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Hans Hagen
  • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, T T
• May 12, 2010
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
  • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, David Kastrup
  • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, Arseny Vakhrushev
  • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Richard Hundt
  • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Richard Hundt
  • Lua in browser: some good news, Fabien
  • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, HyperHacker
  • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Limiting access to variables, King, Mike
  • Re: Limiting access to variables, Rob Hoelz
  • Re: Limiting access to variables, Duncan Cross
• May 13, 2010
  • lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Yuri Kozlov
  • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Yuri Kozlov
  • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Yuri Kozlov
  • Access a member from within the table def, Brian Weed
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Vadim Peretokin
  • RE: Access a member from within the table def, Brian Weed
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Rob Hoelz
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Vadim Peretokin
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Robert G. Jakabosky
  • calling c from inside a coroutine, Gedalia Pasternak
  • Re: calling c from inside a coroutine, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: calling c from inside a coroutine, Javier Guerra Giraldez
• May 14, 2010
  • [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Sean Conner
  • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, Mark Feldman
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Renato Maia
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Renato Maia
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Sean Conner
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, Tobias Käs
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, spir ☣
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Leo Razoumov
  • Re: converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: a little someting missing in the C API?, Brian Maher
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, spir ☣
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: calling c from inside a coroutine, Gedalia Pasternak
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, steve donovan
  • Locale-specific string patterns, Jim Jennings
  • RE: Limiting access to variables, King, Mike
• May 15, 2010
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Henk Boom
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, steve donovan
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Stuart P. Bentley
  • [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-2, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, steve donovan
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Duncan Cross
  • Is luadist.org site down?, Martin
  • Re: Is luadist.org site down?, Peter Drahos
  • Re: Is luadist.org site down?, Michael Wolf
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Jonathan Castello
• May 16, 2010
  • Re[2]: Is luadist.org site down?, Bulat Ziganshin
  • Lua interactive interpreter in browser, Attila
  • Re: Lua interactive interpreter in browser, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Lua interactive interpreter in browser, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Flemming Madsen
  • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, David Kastrup
• May 17, 2010
  • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Flemming Madsen
  • luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), rubanetz
  • Re: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • RE: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), Benoit Germain
  • Re: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Re: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), rubanetz
  • Re: Re: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • crash report: Scite/LfW may crash when tracing a buggy script with .wlua extension, Benoit Germain
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Imagine Mailing Lists
• May 18, 2010
  • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Pan Shi Zhu
  • Italian Translation, totti10@<a href="/cgi-bin/echo.cgi?tiscali.it">...</a>
  • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • LuaForWindows LuaRocks package installation, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: LuaForWindows LuaRocks package installation, steve donovan
  • Re: Italian Translation, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, James Snyder
  • Re: LuaForWindows LuaRocks package installation, Ryan Pusztai
  • [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Drake Wilson
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Vincent Torri
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Geoff Leyland
  • makefile targets, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • isprint, isgraph &c., Reuben Thomas
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Tony Finch
• May 19, 2010
  • Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2), David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, David Manura
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Brett Nash
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Wesley Smith
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, David Kastrup
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Fabien
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alex Davies
  • 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
  • Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Kristofer Karlsson
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Alex Davies
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Alex Davies
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Jim Whitehead II
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Alex Davies
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: makefile targets, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: makefile targets, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Duncan Cross
  • RE: 5.2 work3 manual, Cuero Bugot
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Doug Currie
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alexander Gladysh
  • petition to keep ipairs alive, Norbert Kiesel
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Bruno Silvestre
  • nil & #, spir ☣
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, HyperHacker
  • Re: Disabling assert function, HyperHacker
  • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Andre Carregal
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Wesley Smith
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Peter Cawley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Wesley Smith
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Doug Currie
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, liam mail
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Sean Conner
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, GrayFace
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Petite Abeille
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Joshua Jensen
• May 20, 2010
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Mark Feldman
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Romulo
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, David Burgess
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Quae Quack
  • Re: Disabling assert function, David Manura
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Henk Boom
  • Re: Re: Italian Translation, Yuri Cervoni
  • Re: Re: Italian Translation, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Gilles Ganault
  • [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Marc OMorain
  • Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, Satz Klauer
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, steve donovan
  • Re: Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, steve donovan
  • Re: Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, spir ☣
  • Re: Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, Satz Klauer
  • Re: Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Re: Italian Translation, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, steve donovan
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, steve donovan
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Romulo
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, François Perrad
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Romulo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Brett Nash
  • A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Peter Cawley
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, steve donovan
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Tony Finch
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Peter Cawley
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, steve donovan
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, steve donovan
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Michal Kottman
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, steve donovan
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, François Perrad
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Hisham
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Michal Kottman
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, François Perrad
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, steve donovan
  • [ANN] LuaNova Authentication-based permission groups in Sputnik, steve donovan
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re:Re: Italian translation, Yuri Cervoni
  • Re: Re: Italian translation, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Disabling assert function, HyperHacker
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
  • Re[2]: Disabling assert function, Arseny Vakhrushev
• May 21, 2010
  • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Drake Wilson
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Chris Hafey
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Alex Davies
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Alex Queiroz
  • Italian translation, Yuri Cervoni
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Alex Davies
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Chris Hafey
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Italian translation, Michal Kottman
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Peter Cawley
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Drake Wilson
  • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Drake Wilson
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, François Perrad
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Henk Boom
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Mike Pall
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Henk Boom
  • Re: Italian translation, Andrea D'Amore
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Tobias Kieslich
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Wim Couwenberg
• May 22, 2010
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, David Manura
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Quae Quack
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, Duck
  • Lua 5.2 work3 and luaL_openlibs, liam mail
  • Re: Lua 5.2 work3 and luaL_openlibs, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Tobias Markmann
  • Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Duck
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Ben Kelly
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Quae Quack
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, steve donovan
  • pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Ulrik Sverdrup
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Joshua Jensen
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • [no subject], Yuri Cervoni
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Florian Weimer
  • The 5.1 manual broken?, George Petsagourakis
  • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, George Petsagourakis
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Florian Weimer
  • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Mike Schmitz
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Ulrik Sverdrup
  • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, George Petsagourakis
  • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Petite Abeille
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: makefile targets, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., joshua simmons
• May 23, 2010
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Quae Quack
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Florian Weimer
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Florian Weimer
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Florian Weimer
  • Re: A note on automatic resource management, Florian Weimer
  • Re: A note on automatic resource management, Florian Weimer
  • Re: A note on automatic resource management, steve donovan
  • Re: A note on automatic resource management, Florian Weimer
  • Re: (unknown), Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: makefile targets, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re:, Andrea D'Amore
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Vincent Torri
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Vincent Torri
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Jonathan Castello
  • Italian translation, Yuri Cervoni
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Florian Weimer
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Henk Boom
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Florian Weimer
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Italian translation, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Edgar Toernig
  • Luabins format change warning, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• May 24, 2010
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, GrayFace
  • Re: Luabins format change warning, Alexander Gladysh
  • OT complied language most like Lua?, Patrick
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Kurt Nordstrom
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, joshua simmons
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Italian translation (Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo), Yuri Cervoni
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, joshua simmons
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Vincent Torri
  • Re: Italian translation (Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo), steve donovan
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Frank Meier-Dörnberg
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, steve donovan
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Florian Weimer
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, steve donovan
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Leo Razoumov
  • Newbie question, Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: Newbie question, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Newbie question, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Newbie question, Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tony Finch
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Alex Queiroz
  • How to use generational gc [was Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3], Juris Kalnins
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Duncan Cross
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Jeff Pohlmeyer
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tony Finch
  • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Juri Munkki
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, steve donovan
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Duncan Cross
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, GrayFace
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, James Graves
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Henk Boom
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • [ANN] luatcc 1.0.1, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, GrayFace
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, David Kastrup
  • table "ordinal" indexes, spir ☣
  • Re: table "ordinal" indexes, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: table "ordinal" indexes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Mike Pall
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Wim Couwenberg
  • Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Romulo
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
  • idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Jonathan Castello
• May 25, 2010
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Peter Cawley
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, steve donovan
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Juri Munkki
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, steve donovan
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, spir ☣
  • Re: table "ordinal" indexes, spir ☣
  • Re: table "ordinal" indexes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Juris Kalnins
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, steve donovan
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, steve donovan
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Juris Kalnins
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, steve donovan
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • RE: Abolishing the numeric-for, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Henk Boom
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Tom N Harris
• May 26, 2010
  • Re: [ANN] luatcc 1.0.1, Hu Qiwei
  • question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Juris Kalnins
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, steve donovan
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Juri Munkki
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, steve donovan
  • an Interval factory, spir ☣
  • Re: an Interval factory, steve donovan
  • Re: an Interval factory, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: an Interval factory, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: an Interval factory, spir ☣
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
  • Re: an Interval factory, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: an Interval factory, steve donovan
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Patrick
  • Re: an Interval factory, Shmuel Zeigerman
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: an Interval factory, Eike Decker
  • Re: an Interval factory, steve donovan
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Juris Kalnins
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Juris Kalnins
  • Re: an Interval factory, Duncan Cross
  • Re: an Interval factory, steve donovan
  • Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, 木村 圭佑
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Rob Kendrick
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, phlnc8
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, phlnc8
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Duncan Cross
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, phlnc8
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, 木村 圭佑
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, George Petsagourakis
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • 'deprecated' functions in Lua 5.2.0-work3, David Kolf
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Matthew M. Burke
  • Re: 'deprecated' functions in Lua 5.2.0-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Patrick
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Matt Campbell
• May 27, 2010
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, gary ng
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Romulo
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, gary ng
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
  • lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, Valerio Schiavoni
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Romulo
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, gary ng
  • Re: lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, gary ng
  • Re: lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, gary ng
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Romulo
  • Re: lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, Valerio Schiavoni
  • Re: lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, gary ng
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Henk Boom
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Petite Abeille
  • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] luatcc 1.0.1, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: [ANN] luatcc 1.0.1, Jerome Vuarand
  • [ANN] Luabins 0.3, Alexander Gladysh
• May 28, 2010
  • lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Dmitry Gapkalov
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Vyacheslav Egorov
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Dmitry Gapkalov
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), HyperHacker
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), KHMan
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), KHMan
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), KHMan
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, RJ Russell
• May 29, 2010
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, GrayFace
  • Numeric for loops..., duck
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Eike Decker
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Duncan Cross
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Duncan Cross
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Leo Razoumov
  • Getting the value of environment variables, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Attila
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, HyperHacker
  • Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Duboucher Thomas
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Peter Cawley
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Jorge
  • Web form submission in Lua, John Edwards
• May 30, 2010
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Rene Rebe
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, HyperHacker
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, Fernando P. García
  • Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), Peter Cawley
  • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), Peter Cawley
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), James McKaskill
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), Duboucher Thomas
  • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
  • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
  • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), James McKaskill
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), Duboucher Thomas
  • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), James McKaskill
  • Lua-like python dict..., spir ☣
  • Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Matthew Wild
  • [Xavante] site example doesn't work, Tom
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
  • Re: [Xavante] site example doesn't work, Quae Quack
• May 31, 2010
  • Replacing LUA_GLOBALSINDEX when porting 5.1 libs to 5.2..., duck
  • Re: Replacing LUA_GLOBALSINDEX when porting 5.1 libs to 5.2..., Peter Cawley
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Gilles Ganault
  • Another GLOBALSINDEX question..., duck
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., steve donovan
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., steve donovan
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Duboucher Thomas
  • how to tune generational collector in work3?, Juris Kalnins
  • Re: [Xavante] site example doesn't work, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: how to tune generational collector in work3?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, John Edwards
  • Looking to connect with people working on luaInterface, Joe Finn
  • Q re using a standard C lib with lua, Heinz Wittenbecher
  • Re: Q re using a standard C lib with lua, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Q re using a standard C lib with lua, Heinz Wittenbecher

---

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19