lua-l archive

[Date Index] [Thread Index]

• Re: Lua and the iPhone, Ed
  • Re: Lua and the iPhone, Joseph Saadé
  • Re[2]: Lua and the iPhone, Arseny Vakhrushev
    • Re: Lua and the iPhone, KHMan
  • Re: Lua and the iPhone, Roberto Ierusalimschy
• Re: 2-d Array, Christoph Schreiber
• Non SQL databases, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Lucas Hermann Negri
    • Re: Non SQL databases, Luciano de Souza
      • Re: Non SQL databases, Michal Kottman
      • Re: Non SQL databases, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Javier Guerra Giraldez
    • Re: Non SQL databases, Scott Vokes
  • Re: Non SQL databases, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• Compiling a DLL to be used in Lua, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Compiling a DLL to be used in Lua, Tom N Harris
• Re: number parsing question, spir ☣
• lucksocket ipv6 patch?, startx
• Re: FPE with using >INT_MAX numbers in Lua, Shmuel Zeigerman
• lqt on OS X, Doug Currie
• 5.2.0 (work 2), Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2), Rob Kendrick
    • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2), Gavin Wraith
• Re: QtLua Library on windows, Alexandre Becoulet
• Trying to make a World of Warcraft addon. Very unfamiliar with Lua., Deejai
  • Re: Trying to make a World of Warcraft addon. Very unfamiliar with Lua., Jim Whitehead II
• CSE chains in LuaJIT 2.0, Nicholas Nethercote
  • Re: CSE chains in LuaJIT 2.0, Mike Pall
    • Re: CSE chains in LuaJIT 2.0, Nicholas Nethercote
• Help Porting Lua embedded app to Windows 7, Edward Mitchell
• converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: a little someting missing in the C API?, Benoit Germain
  • Re: converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: alittle someting missing in the C API?, Alex Davies
  • Re: converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: a little someting missing in the C API?, Julien Cugnière
    • Re: converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: a little someting missing in the C API?, Brian Maher
  • Re: converting a relative stack index into an absolute stack index: a little someting missing in the C API?, Patrick Donnelly
• [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), François Perrad
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), HyperHacker
    • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), steve donovan
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Duncan Cross
    • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), steve donovan
      • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Florian Weimer
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), spir ☣
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), steve donovan
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), spir ☣
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Duncan Cross
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), GrayFace
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
      • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Alex Queiroz
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Alex Queiroz
      • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
      • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • RE: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Benoit Germain
    • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Michal Kolodziejczyk
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), François Perrad
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), steve donovan
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), François Perrad
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Paul Hudson
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Duncan Cross
      • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: [PROPOSAL] a new function: table.proto(), François Perrad
• Re: Lua Perl Bridge, Rob Hoelz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lua Perl Bridge, Rob Hoelz
• Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
    • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Doug Currie
    • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Ignacio Burgueño
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Ignacio Burgueño
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Yuri Takhteyev
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Fabio Mascarenhas
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Michal Kolodziejczyk
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Henk Boom
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Doug Currie
      • Re: Mongoose + Lua + SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
• Shortest Path, Mariusz Stanisz
  • Re: Shortest Path, Geoff Leyland
    • Re: Shortest Path, Mariusz Stanisz
  • Re: Shortest Path, varol kaptan
    • Re: Shortest Path, Mariusz Stanisz
    • Re: Shortest Path, Geoff Leyland
• Running Lua as CGI handler?, Gilles Ganault
• [Windows] How to access SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: [Windows] How to access SQLite?, sagasw
    • Re: [Windows] How to access SQLite?, Gilles Ganault
• CGILua binary for Windows?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Ignacio Burgueño
    • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Ignacio Burgueño
      • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: CGILua binary for Windows?, Gilles Ganault
• Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Charles Nicholson
  • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Vaughan McAlley
      • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Patrick Donnelly
      • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Charles Nicholson
      • Re: Can I save size by dumping a table of chunks? (and, how do I do it?), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• [] in C struct, Silence
  • Re: [] in C struct, Florian Weimer
    • Re: [] in C struct, Aurora
      • Re: [] in C struct, steve donovan
      • Re: [] in C struct, frank
      • Re: [] in C struct, steve donovan
      • Re: Re: [] in C struct, Aurora
      • Re: [] in C struct, KHMan
• A very strange problem in C code., Aurora
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Aurora
      • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Tomas Guisasola Gorham
      • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Aurora
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Bulat Ziganshin
  • Re: A very strange problem in C code., Sean Conner
• luadoc installation: enough reading, need revelation, Mark Szpakowski
  • Re: luadoc installation: enough reading, need revelation, Duboucher Thomas
    • Re: luadoc installation: enough reading, need revelation, Hisham
  • Re: luadoc installation: enough reading, need revelation, Hisham
• Is this a bug?, xiayong
  • Re: Is this a bug?, Mark Feldman
  • Re: Is this a bug?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
• "namespaces and "constructor calls", Christoph Schreiber
  • Re: "namespaces and "constructor calls", Florian Weimer
• debugging a C module using LfW?, Benoit Germain
  • Re: debugging a C module using LfW?, steve donovan
  • RE: debugging a C module using LfW?, Antonio Scuri
    • RE: debugging a C module using LfW?, Benoit Germain
    • RE: debugging a C module using LfW?, Benoit Germain
• 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Florian Weimer
    • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Gavin Wraith
      • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: 5.2.0 (work 2) and luac, Gavin Wraith
• Implementing "super()" for classes, Aaron MacDonald
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, Ted Unangst
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, Romulo
    • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, spir ☣
      • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, steve donovan
      • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, spir ☣
      • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, HyperHacker
      • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Implementing "super()" for classes, Arseny Vakhrushev
• sunday afternoon whishlist, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Peter Cawley
    • Re: sunday afternoon wishlist, Klaus Ripke
      • Re: sunday afternoon wishlist, Peter Cawley
      • Re: sunday afternoon wishlist, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Florian Weimer
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Eike Decker
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, anna
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Gavin Wraith
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Gavin Wraith
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, liam mail
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Duncan Cross
      • Inheritance, Christoph Schreiber
      • Re: Inheritance, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Inheritance, Christoph Schreiber
      • Re: Inheritance, Florian Weimer
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Tony Finch
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, steve donovan
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Richard Hundt
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Richard Hundt
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, steve donovan
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Eike Decker
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Tony Finch
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
      • Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Andre Leiradella
      • Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
      • Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
      • Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Andre Leiradella
      • Re: {SPAM?} Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: {SPAM?} Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Andre Leiradella
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Juris Kalnins
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Quae Quack
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Juris Kalnins
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Juris Kalnins
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, HyperHacker
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Patrick Donnelly
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, "J.Jørgen von Bargen"
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Petite Abeille
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, "J.Jørgen von Bargen"
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Alex Davies
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Petite Abeille
      • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, Arseny Vakhrushev
      • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, Arseny Vakhrushev
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Gary Bringhurst
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
  • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Marc OMorain
    • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Henk Boom
    • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, Arseny Vakhrushev
      • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, M Joonas Pihlaja
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, spir ☣
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: sunday afternoon whishlist, Jonathan Castello
      • Re[2]: sunday afternoon whishlist, Arseny Vakhrushev
• Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2), Florian Weimer
  • Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2), Drake Wilson
    • Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2), Florian Weimer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: rename LUA_RIDX_CPCALL to LUA_RIDX_CCALL? (5.2.0-work2), David Manura
• [Lua 5.2] luaL_ref and the LUA_RIDX_* fields, Patrick Donnelly
  • Re: [Lua 5.2] luaL_ref and the LUA_RIDX_* fields, Roberto Ierusalimschy
• IUP 'TreeSetUserId' problem in Ubuntu, bhou
  • RE: IUP 'TreeSetUserId' problem in Ubuntu, Antonio Scuri
• [ANN] GitHub repository for LuaPerl, Rob Hoelz
• [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Leo Razoumov
    • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Hans Hagen
      • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Leo Razoumov
      • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, Hans Hagen
      • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, David Kastrup
      • Re: [ANN] new corporate sponsor, T T
• Syslogintr just released. A syslog daemon that uses Lua, Sean Conner
• Bug in LNUM patch, Flemming Madsen
  • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Richard Hundt
    • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Richard Hundt
    • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Flemming Madsen
      • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, David Kastrup
      • Re: Bug in LNUM patch, Flemming Madsen
• TomTom GPS navigator and Lua, Leo Razoumov
• Lua in browser: some good news, Fabien
  • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, HyperHacker
    • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, Mark Feldman
  • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • Re: Lua in browser: some good news, Tobias Käs
• Limiting access to variables, King, Mike
  • Re: Limiting access to variables, Rob Hoelz
    • RE: Limiting access to variables, King, Mike
  • Re: Limiting access to variables, Duncan Cross
• lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Yuri Kozlov
  • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Yuri Kozlov
    • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Yuri Kozlov
    • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Pan Shi Zhu
      • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: lbc: nil returned while number divided by 0, Stuart P. Bentley
• Access a member from within the table def, Brian Weed
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Vadim Peretokin
    • RE: Access a member from within the table def, Brian Weed
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Renato Maia
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, spir ☣
    • Re: Access a member from within the table def, steve donovan
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, spir ☣
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, steve donovan
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Henk Boom
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, steve donovan
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, steve donovan
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Duncan Cross
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Jonathan Castello
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Rob Hoelz
    • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Vadim Peretokin
      • Re: Access a member from within the table def, Robert G. Jakabosky
• calling c from inside a coroutine, Gedalia Pasternak
  • Re: calling c from inside a coroutine, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: calling c from inside a coroutine, Javier Guerra Giraldez
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: calling c from inside a coroutine, Gedalia Pasternak
• [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Sean Conner
    • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Renato Maia
      • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Sean Conner
    • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Alexander Gladysh
    • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Alexander Gladysh
      • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Imagine Mailing Lists
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Leo Razoumov
    • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-1, James Snyder
• Locale-specific string patterns, Jim Jennings
• [ANN] patch-lua-5.1.4-2, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• Is luadist.org site down?, Martin
  • Re: Is luadist.org site down?, Peter Drahos
    • Re[2]: Is luadist.org site down?, Bulat Ziganshin
  • Re: Is luadist.org site down?, Michael Wolf
• Lua interactive interpreter in browser, Attila
  • Re: Lua interactive interpreter in browser, Matthew Wild
  • Re: Lua interactive interpreter in browser, Jim Whitehead II
• luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), rubanetz
  • Re: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: Re: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), rubanetz
      • Re: Re: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • RE: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), Benoit Germain
    • Re: luac -s produced bad code (Lua 5.0), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• crash report: Scite/LfW may crash when tracing a buggy script with .wlua extension, Benoit Germain
• Italian Translation, totti10@<a href="/cgi-bin/echo.cgi?tiscali.it">...</a>
  • Re: Italian Translation, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: Italian Translation, Yuri Cervoni
    • Re: Re: Italian Translation, steve donovan
      • Re: Re: Italian Translation, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re:Re: Italian translation, Yuri Cervoni
    • Re: Re: Italian translation, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Italian translation, Yuri Cervoni
    • Re: Italian translation, Michal Kottman
      • Re: Italian translation, Andrea D'Amore
  • Italian translation, Yuri Cervoni
    • Re: Italian translation, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• LuaForWindows LuaRocks package installation, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: LuaForWindows LuaRocks package installation, steve donovan
    • Re: LuaForWindows LuaRocks package installation, Ryan Pusztai
• [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Petite Abeille
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Enrico Colombini
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Duncan Cross
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Duncan Cross
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Mike Pall
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, David Kastrup
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Shmuel Zeigerman
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alex Davies
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, steve donovan
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Klaus Ripke
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, steve donovan
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Michal Kolodziejczyk
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alexander Gladysh
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Bruno Silvestre
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Petite Abeille
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alexander Gladysh
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Peter Cawley
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Wesley Smith
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, liam mail
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Sean Conner
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, GrayFace
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Joshua Jensen
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Petite Abeille
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, spir ☣
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Brett Nash
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Philippe Lhoste
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, steve donovan
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alexander Gladysh
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Tobias Kieslich
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, GrayFace
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Fabien
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Enrico Colombini
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Duncan Cross
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Peter Cawley
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Geoff Leyland
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Vincent Torri
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Brett Nash
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Wesley Smith
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, M Joonas Pihlaja
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Philippe Lhoste
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Vincent Torri
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, steve donovan
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Rob Kendrick
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Vincent Torri
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Vincent Torri
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Alex Queiroz
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Jeff Pohlmeyer
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Leo Razoumov
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, David Kastrup
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Wim Couwenberg
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Geoff Leyland
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Petite Abeille
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Geoff Leyland
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Geoff Leyland
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Duncan Cross
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Tony Finch
    • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, David Manura
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Philippe Lhoste
      • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available, Tony Finch
• Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Drake Wilson
  • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Drake Wilson
      • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Some comments on CPS control flow functions in Lua 5.2, Drake Wilson
• makefile targets, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: makefile targets, Stuart P. Bentley
    • Re: makefile targets, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: makefile targets, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: makefile targets, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• isprint, isgraph &c., Reuben Thomas
  • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., joshua simmons
      • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: isprint, isgraph &c., Stuart P. Bentley
• 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Kristofer Karlsson
  • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Alex Davies
    • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Alex Davies
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Duncan Cross
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Gavin Wraith
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Doug Currie
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Doug Currie
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Quae Quack
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Florian Weimer
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Juris Kalnins
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Tony Finch
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, steve donovan
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, steve donovan
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Juris Kalnins
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Florian Weimer
      • RE: 5.2 work3 manual, Cuero Bugot
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Alexander Gladysh
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Alex Queiroz
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: 5.2 work3 manual, Stuart P. Bentley
• Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
    • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
      • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Alex Davies
    • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
      • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Jim Whitehead II
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
      • Re: Disabling assert function, HyperHacker
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Marc OMorain
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Romulo
      • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Romulo
      • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re[2]: Disabling assert function, Arseny Vakhrushev
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Mark Hamburg
      • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Romulo
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Disabling assert function, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Disabling assert function, steve donovan
  • Re: Disabling assert function, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: Disabling assert function, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • Re: Disabling assert function, David Manura
    • Re: Disabling assert function, Henk Boom
      • Re: Disabling assert function, HyperHacker
• [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Fabio Mascarenhas
    • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Andre Carregal
      • Re: [newbie] How to install Xavante?, Gilles Ganault
• petition to keep ipairs alive, Norbert Kiesel
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, HyperHacker
    • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Wesley Smith
    • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Mark Feldman
    • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Romulo
    • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Shmuel Zeigerman
      • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Fabio Mascarenhas
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, David Burgess
  • Re: petition to keep ipairs alive, Quae Quack
• nil & #, spir ☣
• [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, steve donovan
    • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, steve donovan
      • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, steve donovan
      • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Hisham
      • Re: [Xavante] Installing without LuaRocks?, Gilles Ganault
• Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, Satz Klauer
  • Re: Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, steve donovan
  • Re: Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, Rob Kendrick
    • Re: Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, Satz Klauer
  • Re: Inegrate LUA interpreter in other application, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, François Perrad
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, steve donovan
    • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Enrico Colombini
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Peter Cawley
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, steve donovan
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, François Perrad
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, steve donovan
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, François Perrad
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, François Perrad
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Henk Boom
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Henk Boom
    • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
      • Re: Recipe: setfenv with Lua 5.2.0 work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
• A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Peter Cawley
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Tony Finch
    • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Peter Cawley
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
    • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Enrico Colombini
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, steve donovan
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Duncan Cross
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Petite Abeille
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Jerome Vuarand
    • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Peter Cawley
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Drake Wilson
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Jerome Vuarand
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Mike Pall
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • How to use generational gc [was Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3], Juris Kalnins
      • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, David Manura
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Mike Pall
  • Re: A review of changes between 5.1 and 5.2-work3, Wim Couwenberg
• How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, steve donovan
    • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Fabio Mascarenhas
    • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Michal Kottman
      • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Michal Kottman
      • Re: How to watch what wsapi.exe does?, Gilles Ganault
• [ANN] LuaNova Authentication-based permission groups in Sputnik, steve donovan
• Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Alex Queiroz
      • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Quae Quack
    • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, steve donovan
      • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Patrick
      • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Matthew M. Burke
      • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Patrick
      • Re: Lua Workshop 2010!, Matt Campbell
• Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Chris Hafey
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Alex Davies
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Alex Davies
      • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Chris Hafey
      • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Alex Queiroz
      • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Tobias Markmann
      • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
  • Re: Statically linking to Lua from multiple shared libaries, Alex Queiroz
• lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, M Joonas Pihlaja
  • Re: lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, Alex Queiroz
• Re: lua 5.2-work3: luaL_loadfile no longer accepts bytecode files with a shebang, Duck
• Lua 5.2 work3 and luaL_openlibs, liam mail
  • Re: Lua 5.2 work3 and luaL_openlibs, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Duck
  • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, M Joonas Pihlaja
    • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Klaus Ripke
      • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Quae Quack
      • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, steve donovan
      • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Joshua Jensen
      • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Jonathan Castello
    • Re: Is it necessary to kill ipairs()?, Ben Kelly
• ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Klaus Ripke
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Florian Weimer
  • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Juri Munkki
    • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, steve donovan
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, James Graves
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, M Joonas Pihlaja
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, steve donovan
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Alexander Gladysh
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, steve donovan
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Juri Munkki
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, steve donovan
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, phlnc8
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, phlnc8
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, Duncan Cross
      • Re: ipairs and extending numeric for loop, phlnc8
• pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Ulrik Sverdrup
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Florian Weimer
      • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Florian Weimer
    • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Ulrik Sverdrup
    • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Peter Cawley
  • Re: pairs() instead of ipairs() in Lua 5.2, Stuart P. Bentley
• [no subject], Yuri Cervoni
  • Re: (unknown), Philippe Lhoste
  • Re:, Andrea D'Amore
• The 5.1 manual broken?, George Petsagourakis
  • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Jonathan Castello
    • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, George Petsagourakis
      • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Rob Kendrick
      • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, George Petsagourakis
      • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Mike Schmitz
      • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: The 5.1 manual broken?, Petite Abeille
• Re: A note on automatic resource management, Florian Weimer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A note on automatic resource management, Florian Weimer
    • Re: A note on automatic resource management, steve donovan
      • Re: A note on automatic resource management, Florian Weimer
• The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Mark Hamburg
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Jonathan Castello
    • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Florian Weimer
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Henk Boom
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Florian Weimer
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Mark Hamburg
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Peter Cawley
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tony Finch
    • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Edgar Toernig
    • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Mark Hamburg
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Enrico Colombini
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Duncan Cross
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, GrayFace
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Henk Boom
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, GrayFace
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Henk Boom
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Mike Pall
      • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Edgar Toernig
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Duncan Cross
    • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Tony Finch
  • Re: The removal of function environments: An opportunity for optimization?, Patrick Donnelly
• Luabins format change warning, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Luabins format change warning, Alexander Gladysh
• OT complied language most like Lua?, Patrick
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Kurt Nordstrom
    • Message not available
      • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, joshua simmons
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Stuart P. Bentley
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, joshua simmons
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Philippe Lhoste
    • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Philippe Lhoste
      • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, steve donovan
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Frank Meier-Dörnberg
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, steve donovan
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Florian Weimer
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Javier Guerra Giraldez
    • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Antonio Vieiro
      • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Alex Queiroz
      • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, steve donovan
      • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Florian Weimer
      • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Antonio Vieiro
      • Re: OT complied language most like Lua?, Alex Queiroz
• Re: Italian translation (Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo), Yuri Cervoni
  • Re: Italian translation (Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo), steve donovan
• Newbie question, Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: Newbie question, Alexander Gladysh
  • Re: Newbie question, Florian Weimer
    • Re: Newbie question, Antonio Vieiro
• [ANN] luatcc 1.0.1, Jerome Vuarand
  • Re: [ANN] luatcc 1.0.1, Hu Qiwei
    • Re: [ANN] luatcc 1.0.1, Javier Guerra Giraldez
      • Re: [ANN] luatcc 1.0.1, Jerome Vuarand
• table "ordinal" indexes, spir ☣
  • Re: table "ordinal" indexes, Alex Queiroz
  • Re: table "ordinal" indexes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: table "ordinal" indexes, spir ☣
      • Re: table "ordinal" indexes, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
    • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, M Joonas Pihlaja
    • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, M Joonas Pihlaja
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, M Joonas Pihlaja
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Fabio Mascarenhas
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Tom N Harris
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, M Joonas Pihlaja
    • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, George Petsagourakis
    • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Jonathan Castello
    • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Petite Abeille
    • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, RJ Russell
  • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, GrayFace
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Abolishing the numeric-for, Mark Hamburg
    • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Edgar Toernig
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Juri Munkki
      • Re: Abolishing the numeric-for, Stuart P. Bentley
• idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Jonathan Castello
    • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
  • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
    • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, Stuart P. Bentley
      • Re: idea: __iter generic-for metamethod, spir ☣
• question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Juris Kalnins
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Roberto Ierusalimschy
    • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Juris Kalnins
      • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Juris Kalnins
      • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Roberto Ierusalimschy
  • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Jerome Vuarand
    • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Henk Boom
      • Re: question about emergency gc (5.2work3), Jerome Vuarand
• an Interval factory, spir ☣
  • Re: an Interval factory, steve donovan
    • Re: an Interval factory, Wim Couwenberg
      • Re: an Interval factory, spir ☣
      • Re: an Interval factory, Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: an Interval factory, steve donovan
      • Re: an Interval factory, Shmuel Zeigerman
      • Re: an Interval factory, Eike Decker
      • Re: an Interval factory, steve donovan
      • Re: an Interval factory, Duncan Cross
      • Re: an Interval factory, steve donovan
  • Re: an Interval factory, Jonathan Castello
• Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, 木村 圭佑
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Rob Kendrick
    • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, 木村 圭佑
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Petite Abeille
  • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Petite Abeille
    • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, gary ng
      • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Romulo
      • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, gary ng
      • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Romulo
      • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, gary ng
      • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Romulo
      • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Petite Abeille
      • Re: Question about LuaSocket : Always receive Http Error:Number 302, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• 'deprecated' functions in Lua 5.2.0-work3, David Kolf
  • Re: 'deprecated' functions in Lua 5.2.0-work3, Roberto Ierusalimschy
• lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, Valerio Schiavoni
  • Re: lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, gary ng
  • Re: lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, gary ng
    • Re: lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, Valerio Schiavoni
      • Re: lxyssl, aes and rsa questions, gary ng
• [ANN] Luabins 0.3, Alexander Gladysh
• lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Dmitry Gapkalov
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Vyacheslav Egorov
    • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Dmitry Gapkalov
    • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), HyperHacker
      • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), KHMan
      • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), M Joonas Pihlaja
      • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), KHMan
      • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Roberto Ierusalimschy
      • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), KHMan
  • Re: lua_number2int in bitwise operators Lua 5.2 work 3 (MSVC), Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
• Numeric for loops..., duck
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Jonathan Castello
    • Re: Numeric for loops..., Eike Decker
    • Re: Numeric for loops..., Duncan Cross
      • Re: Numeric for loops..., Duncan Cross
      • Re: Numeric for loops..., Jonathan Castello
    • Re: Numeric for loops..., Leo Razoumov
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., Philippe Lhoste
  • Re: Numeric for loops..., steve donovan
    • Re: Numeric for loops..., M Joonas Pihlaja
      • Re: Numeric for loops..., steve donovan
• Getting the value of environment variables, Luciano de Souza
  • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Attila
    • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Luciano de Souza
    • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, HyperHacker
      • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Luciano de Souza
      • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
      • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Peter Cawley
      • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Jonathan Castello
      • Re: Getting the value of environment variables, Florian Weimer
• Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Duboucher Thomas
    • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, M Joonas Pihlaja
      • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Gilles Ganault
      • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Duboucher Thomas
      • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Gilles Ganault
  • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Jorge
    • Re: Lua + modules on ARM, Blackfin, etc.?, Rene Rebe
• Web form submission in Lua, John Edwards
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, HyperHacker
    • Re: Web form submission in Lua, Fernando P. García
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, Michal Kolodziejczyk
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, Nikolai Kondrashov
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Web form submission in Lua, John Edwards
• Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), Peter Cawley
    • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
      • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), Peter Cawley
      • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), James McKaskill
      • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
      • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), James McKaskill
      • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
      • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), James McKaskill
      • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
  • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), Duboucher Thomas
    • RE: Lua and C++ (stack), Erwin Oegema
      • Re: Lua and C++ (stack), Duboucher Thomas
• Lua-like python dict..., spir ☣
• Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Alexander Gladysh
    • Re: Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
  • Re: Module system curiosity, Matthew Wild
    • Re: Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Module system curiosity, Matthew Wild
      • Re: Module system curiosity, Mark Hamburg
      • Re: Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
      • Re: Module system curiosity, Mark Hamburg
      • Re: Module system curiosity, Florian Weimer
• [Xavante] site example doesn't work, Tom
  • Re: [Xavante] site example doesn't work, Quae Quack
  • Re: [Xavante] site example doesn't work, Fabio Mascarenhas
• Replacing LUA_GLOBALSINDEX when porting 5.1 libs to 5.2..., duck
  • Re: Replacing LUA_GLOBALSINDEX when porting 5.1 libs to 5.2..., Peter Cawley
• Another GLOBALSINDEX question..., duck
• how to tune generational collector in work3?, Juris Kalnins
  • Re: how to tune generational collector in work3?, Roberto Ierusalimschy
• Looking to connect with people working on luaInterface, Joe Finn
• Q re using a standard C lib with lua, Heinz Wittenbecher
  • Re: Q re using a standard C lib with lua, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
    • Re: Q re using a standard C lib with lua, Heinz Wittenbecher

---

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.19