[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: RungeKutta, WalshTransform and Evol
- From: pj@...
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:17:30 +1000
Greetings folks; my first post here... Three of my old
Perl CPAN modules now have call-compatible Lua translations:
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/PJB/Math-RungeKutta-1.07/lua/
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/PJB/Math-WalshTransform-1.17/lua/
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/PJB/Math-Evol-1.12/lua/
(Of course the version numbers will change, so it's safest
to click down from http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/PJB/ )
I"m now trying to learn about Rocks, and make Rocks out
of them to integrate them better into the Lua world.
Would they be better all together in one Rock ?
They do not-really-related things, and a given program
wouldn't in general need more than one of them at once,
and the description/summary and detailed would become .
either long or uninformative.
OTOH, if I imagine http://luarocks.org/repositories/rocks/
with, say, 10000 modules, I feel I shouldn't be creating
more top-level names. And it feels strange to create a
.tar.gz with basically only one file in it...
Other advice about the Rock-process also gratefully received...
Peter Billam
http://www.pjb.com.au pj@pjb.com.au (03) 6278 9410
"Was der Meister nicht kann, vermöcht es der Knabe, hätt er
ihm immer gehorcht?" Siegfried to Mime, from Act 1 Scene 2