[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Article biased against Lua
- From: Pascal Du Maurrier <pascaldumaurrier@...>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:40:11 +0100 (BST)
A recent article appeared on InfoWorld, about "What's hot, what's not in scripting languages" (http://www.infoworld.com/print/175867).
I was amazed to see that Lua is not included in the list. This seems to be a proof of some bias against Lua, or not? Why is Lua not getting the credit that it deserves?
The glaring omission of Lua from the article is all the more outrageous considering how well placed is Lua in the TIOBE index (http://www.tiobe.com/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html). Also see the "Delta in Position" field that indicates the relative loss/gain of each language: Lua is going strong!
Lua should have been mentioned in the article as a SUPER hot language. And yet, it was not even included in their list...
I really don't understand the reason!
