Re: Panda Bears will die, Sloths will live on

[Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@...>]

Can we have this thread die please? I detest the subject header as
extraorinary nonsensitive towards Pandas or biodiversity. Biomass is
first a redicolous meassurement since some livingforms have much
higher throughput of food and thus need more food but have less
biomass (as in terms of "sucessful". Also humans are superceded in
biomass by many species, so what? Thrown into this is neoliberal
marketing speech into a biology analogy to make this reasoning even
more redicolous.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:31 AM, joao lobato <btnfdp.lobato@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/11, Sean Conner <sean@conman.org> wrote:
>> It was thus said that the Great joao lobato once stated:
>
>>   Yes, that will work.  I, personally, don't like it, and will never do such
>> a thing again (yes, a bit on this below), but yes, it will work.  In fact,
>> you can abuse the C preprocessor quite a bit.  Back in my university days, I
>> implemented a template like system for C using the C preprocessor.  Here's a
>> bit of code to give a sample of what it was like:
>
> Yes I knew it would work, I've seen Obfuscated C contestants before :-p.
>
> My point was exactly to demonstrated how bad an idea would it be to
> have this kind of thing in Lua.
>
>