Re: Article biased against Lua

[Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@...>]

I stopped to care about "hot or not" debates somewhere in highschool.

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Pascal Du Maurrier
<pascaldumaurrier@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> A recent article appeared on InfoWorld, about "What's hot, what's not in scripting languages" (http://www.infoworld.com/print/175867).
>
> I was amazed to see that Lua is not included in the list. This seems to be a proof of some bias against Lua, or not? Why is Lua not getting the credit that it deserves?
>
> The glaring omission of Lua from the article is all the more outrageous considering how well placed is Lua in the TIOBE index (http://www.tiobe.com/content/paperinfo/tpci/index.html). Also see the "Delta in Position" field that indicates the relative loss/gain of each language: Lua is going strong!
> Lua should have been mentioned in the article as a SUPER hot language. And yet, it was not even included in their list...
>
> I really don't understand the reason!
>
>
>
>