Re: Idea for a new kind of require

[Rob Hoelz <rob@...>]

That *could* end up being the final syntax; I haven't decided yet.
Consistency would be nice, but I'll end up mixing if it means the
implementation is simpler.

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:46:43 -0500
Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@guerrag.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I really like how you can do "require 'foo'" or "require:xyz
> > 'foo'". I may have to steal that idea.
> 
> why i don't get is why to use  "require:xyz 'foo'" instead of
> "require.xyz 'foo'"
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature