Re: Idea for a new kind of require

[Rob Hoelz <rob@...>]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:32:22 +0200
Rob Hoelz <rob@hoelz.ro> wrote:

> That *could* end up being the final syntax; I haven't decided yet.
> Consistency would be nice, but I'll end up mixing if it means the
> implementation is simpler.
> 
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:46:43 -0500
> Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@guerrag.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Rena <hyperhacker@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I really like how you can do "require 'foo'" or "require:xyz
> > > 'foo'". I may have to steal that idea.
> > 
> > why i don't get is why to use  "require:xyz 'foo'" instead of
> > "require.xyz 'foo'"
> > 
> 

For interesting parties, I have started development:

https://github.com/hoelzro/lua-require

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature