Re: nanomsg binding?

[Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...>]

Justin Cormack <justin@specialbusservice.com> [2013-11-11 18:52:24]:

> BTW, its not a complete solution but I have been fixing luaffi
> https://github.com/jmckaskill/luaffi recently. I am thinking of using it as
> a struct library but still with C API function calls (as thats the non
> portable bit).

Oh, nice to see Windows CE there! Now just Linux ARM/MIPS support and I'm
all-in :-)

No, I'm kidding. I can't help myself but FFI adds just another layer to the
solution.  And I tend to see each layer as a potential source of troubles.
Maybe, that it's just because I'm little bit conservative.

Anyway, nice work!

-- ynezz