[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: nanomsg binding?
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:10:14 -0600
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz> wrote:
> Justin Cormack <justin@specialbusservice.com> [2013-11-11 18:52:24]:
>
>> BTW, its not a complete solution but I have been fixing luaffi
>> https://github.com/jmckaskill/luaffi recently. I am thinking of using it as
>> a struct library but still with C API function calls (as thats the non
>> portable bit).
>
> Oh, nice to see Windows CE there! Now just Linux ARM/MIPS support and I'm
> all-in :-)
>
> No, I'm kidding. I can't help myself but FFI adds just another layer to the
> solution. And I tend to see each layer as a potential source of troubles.
> Maybe, that it's just because I'm little bit conservative.
>
> Anyway, nice work!
>
> -- ynezz
>
Feel free to check out my Work In Progress. I'll announce it when
documentation is done and I'm finished with the GC process. Other than
that, it works great.
Also, I would appreciate any and all advice on doing things better.
It's my first real C project, so it's rough.
https://github.com/andrewstarks/nml.git
--Andrew